FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

new midnight mayhem rules

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
5050 View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Location: henderson
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
  Quote 5050 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: new midnight mayhem rules
    Posted: 07 Jan 2009 at 10:30pm
looks like they are trying to put us back on the street with all the new rules. why build a street car that meet's all d o t rules and can't take it to lvms!
 can't move the battrey loaction ? why
 no power adders?
the list goes on let's see if we can get some answers?
no slicks ? lvms is a race track right?
Back to Top
5050 View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Location: henderson
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
  Quote 5050 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 9:28am
looks like this is starting a mess go to  http://www.lvracingscene.com/forum/index.php
and go to the drag strip forms
Back to Top
VegasHB View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
  Quote VegasHB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 6:04pm
I really don't understand a lot of the new rules imposed.  I DO understand they are trying to clean up the scene a little bit and make it safer for all but it's really beyond the scope of "racing".

People like me and my friends go to Midnight Mayhem because we love cars.  We love working on cars and enjoy the results.  I despise street racing and everything that it brings to the "import scene".  So MMH is my only outlet on a budget. 

People who like to race, understand it and go to MMH DON'T HAVE STOCK CARS!!  The new rules imposed have basically handcuffed every car lover I know.  No force induction, no battery relocation and on and on.  It's as if LVMS considers every shade tree mechanic inept at working on cars.  Granted there's a lot of people who shouldn't but use common sense here.  Have your SFI tech say yay or nay but putting an end to so many everyday modifications is crazy.

Who wants to pay to watch a bunch camry's, mustangs, corvettes, 20second civic or whatever mom pulls out of the garage run down the track at a snoozing rate?  Don't get me wrong, i'm not baggin on mustangs or vettes but I wanna see something other than stock.  I wanna see that SC Mustang scream, I wanna see that boosted vette/civic/dodge ram run hard.  Not dad's Pontiac Grand Am GT drop another 16 second run.

You have literally pushed all modified cars back to the streets.  That's the last place they should be.  It was my understanding that MMH was designed to provide a safe outlet for kids and adults alike to enjoy their handy work or money they threw at a piece of steel. 

Yes I know your saying to go to Test N Tune if your cars modified but I can't leave work at noon to get to the track.  I can't afford to pay the money they ask for and I'm sure there's a lot in my same situation.  I want to race my friend and colleagues not a 900hp Nova on slicks or a junior rail car.

Please reconsider, use common sense with your techs.  They know what to look for, let them decide.

I like the no temp registration, no slicks is fine but I don't see the outcry on that.  If fluid is the problem then have your techs check the basics and let us run.  Don't let the kids resort to the streets, the police have enough garbage to worry about.  You and I both don't want 400+ cars there, charge a bit more and put a limit on car count but for god sakes these rules are crazy.

RACING=MODIFYING

It's Las Vegas Motor Speedway, not Las Vegas Motor Sloway/stockway/streetway

Give us the outlet that MMH was made for, don't put them back on the streets.


Edited by VegasHB - 08 Jan 2009 at 6:10pm
Back to Top
VegasHB View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
  Quote VegasHB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 6:27pm
In your add you state "The Strip at LVMS will strictly enforce new rules to keep the program true to its roots of street- legal, stock OEM-type production vehicles."

When at any point was the roots of MMH for stock OEM type production vehicles?  What is OEM "type" anyways?  It's a 1/4 mile dragstrip, not a Smith's Center parking lot.  I'm not there to pick up groceries.  A dragstrip is where you go to race, at what point is ANY OEM vehicle designed for the dragstrip or racing?  Should we all go purchase exotics so we can participate without falling asleep as we rocket down the strip at 60mph turning a 19 second 1/4 mile?  Should we wooooo the crowd with our burnt sienna paint job as we scream past at 20mph in the 60ft mark.  Maybe we should get disco balls or tassles on our mirros to glam it up a bit...but that's not stock either so never mind.

Sorry for the sarcasm...but seriously....
Back to Top
civicguy View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
  Quote civicguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 7:58pm

Wow there won't be anyone there, was that your goal?

Back to Top
kritter03 View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Location: clifornia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
  Quote kritter03 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 9:42pm
excuse my french  but this is bullsh*t theres 7 sec street legal cars out there and now they cant race what they built and spent there hard earned money on. lvms is promoting streetracing now by doing this . i understand if they dont have the proper equipment  but people who are licensed and certified to run certain speed  let them run as long as they pass real tech and have the proper oil retaning device and water in the radiator its not our fault you want street legal cars that drive on the street with coolant in the radiator and the ac on in the staging lanes and you dont enforce it thats not our fault its yours letting the reckless racer race just cause you know them or its your buddy kid and then they oil  down or put coolant down then blame it on the fast cars  cause the when they get squirley  cause the track officials didnt see the coolant from the stock car the run before. thats the officials fault, no matter which way you look at it its the officials fault for not properly inspecting the cars.
Back to Top
nolimitpkr View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote nolimitpkr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jan 2009 at 11:59pm
"Fuel system and battery: All batteries, fuel tanks, fuel lines, fuel pumps, or filler necks must retain stock OEM location as produced by the OEM manufacturer."

So if my 13 second 68 Chevelle has an electric fuel pump at the tank for example and not in the OEM location, I will not be able to race???? I think a representative of LVMS needs to address the current issue with the rule changes; expand and clarify the information recently released about MM!!!
Back to Top
Hondoctors View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
  Quote Hondoctors Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2009 at 1:01am
The no slicks rule pretty much will eliminate all of our cars...Sounds like many of our cars wont be running much this year if this rule is strictly enforced, we all pretty much work till 5 or 6 pm on Fridays and by the time some of our race team members get off of work and get home it is already too late to get ready and make it to Test & Tune on Fridays at most we could get 1 run in or 2 if we are lucky. I personally think many of the spectators enjoy watching 10 and 11 second cars going at it down the drag strip, it brings excitement and hype to the event, without being allowed to use slicks it would eliminate more than 75% of the cars running those times, it may hurt attendance in my opinion..
www.hondoctors.com
Back to Top
Rowdy View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jun 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote Rowdy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2009 at 5:21am
Anyone that was at the last MM of 2008 knows it was probably the straw that broke the camels back. There were a couple catastrophic failures that literally brought everything to a halt for hours (with an "S", as in plural). 420+ racers turned out, huge by any tracks standards, especially with temperatures in 40's. There was the average length line when I arrived around 9pm, early compared to my usual 10-10:30pm. It was a little slow getting up to sign in, not a deal breaker, especially when you find out that there are 400 cars ahead of you. Then I got to spend the next hour and a half parked by the Blue Man Group sign, at least I had plenty of time to fill out my tech card. It was obvious from the proximity of the steam emitted by the clean up equipment that somebody had greased the track from end to end. Privy to overhear conversations from a nearby officials radio, I was aware that there were complications, partially due to the weather, in particular, requiring excessive quantities of propane, as well as, something with the VHT nozzles.
 
I got my first run at 11:53pm (on my time slip). Coming down return road, I saw two Supras, I think, staging. One had been lined up next to me, the other a couple of cars back. I don't think that I'm going out on a limb saying that neither were daily drivers, slicks, big turbos, etc... which I have no problem with. In fact, I was rather anxious to spank the one on my right. Turns out, it wouldn't have taken much of an effort because when the light turned green,  he puked parts. Another hour in the staging lanes.
 
To the credit of the track officials and crew, they made a concious effort for every paid racer to have an opportunity to make at least two passes, announcing as much over the PA. Although scheduled to close at midnite (staging lanes at 11:20), I made my second run sometime around 1am. I thank them for their stand up attitude on an otherwise long, cold, grueling Friday night.
 
That said, I have mixed feelings on yesterdays announcement, not knowing if it was a knee jerk reaction to the chain of events last month (December 12 MM) or, god forbid, some other more sinister agenda. I would call myself a regular at MM, have been for a few years and have stacks of timeslips to prove it. There was a time, actually several, sorta went in spurts, that I (and my Chevelle) were regulars when it was known as the L.V. Speedrome, going back to the days that Alex Rodriguez managed it. While I'd really like to see the cars from those days, the current venue is by far the best, track and tolerance wise. I am a big proponent of LVMS's MM on a national level through Team Chevelle www.chevelles.com and have solicited participation from a number of out of state racers. All have found it to be absolutely top notch in every category. When someone trailers his car (a daily driver from Durango, CO) for 10 hours each way and is completely ecstatic over making only three runs, it says alot about the facility and the way it is operated. For those in attendence October 17, he was in the black '69 Chevelle staged next to (or close to) me all night and had first visited LVMS for PINKS ALL OUT. Several T.C. members participated in CarCraft's AntiTour, April 27, 2007 MM, which was also a PSCA weekend. Every one of them had nothing but positive comments, many posting as such on various websites. That particular MM was memorable personally, as an impromptu CarCraft photo shoot resulted in a four page feature of my Chevelle in the November 2007 issue. 
 
I sincerely hope that Friday night racing as we have come to know it is not in jeopardy. I agree, failures and fluid clean-ups can try ones patience and I can only imagine the frustration of those responsible for track prep, however, it is to be expected from a numbers standpoint. It happens during tightly scrutinized sanctioned events and really shouldn't come as no surprise during an event that can often have twice as many cars participating. I know that I am not alone in expecting modified cars at MM, as Hot Rods are the fundamental cornerstone of drag racing. I could almost understand establishing new rules to weed out a problematic element that frequents MM. Not that I would necessarily approve of this either, but it would certainly stand a better chance than the blanket approach of banning all that is non OEM. If enforced to the letter of the word, it effectively destroys the premise of taking racing off the streets and onto a suitable venue. This was the original purpose for Midnite Mayhem was it not?
 
Midnight Mayhem in its present state is enormously successful. Sure, there are some areas that could be addressed to possibly lessen the adversities and improve the experience in general. I, personally, would like a structured method to accommodate grudge matches. There is so much more appeal for racer and spectator when the competitors are similarly matched (power, era, etc...). An orientation leaflet passed out during registration would definitely benefit newbies (a few veterans too). Simple things like that. MM has developed a significant number of loyal enthusiasts, the 400+ registered participants on December 12, is evidence of that in of itself. While probably not overly profitable, there should be some satisfaction in a job well done, especially considering the contribution towards a safer community.
 
I look forward to the new season and sincerely hope that my concerns are unwarranted. Should change be inevitable, wouldn't establishing somekind of dialog between concerned parties be of tremendous value. As racers, our names and numbers are on file. I know that I would be interested in developing direct communication. Correct me if I'm wrong, this is a program between the residents of the Greater Las Vegas Valley, the municipalities therein and LVMS, is it not.   


Edited by Rowdy - 15 Jan 2009 at 11:59pm
Rowdy
1966 Chevelle
Best ET 10.59
    MPH 129.62
2007 MM/CarCraft AntiTour Link
http://media.putfile.com/April-27-drags
Back to Top
VegasHB View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
  Quote VegasHB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2009 at 5:58pm
Originally posted by Rowdy

 I know that I am not alone in expecting modified cars at MM, as Hot Rods are the fundamental cornerstone of drag racing. I could almost understand establishing new rules to weed out a problematic element that frequents MM. Not that I would necessarily approve of this either, but it would certainly stand a better chance than the blanket approach of banning all that is non OEM.


First off, excellent post.  However I'm unsure as to what you reference in my quote but I'm willing to to guess it's the honda's/imports.  I'm not here to start a pissing match and I'd be willing to say that there's a lot of imports that are hack jobs and shouldn't be on the track but without a doubt there's a fair sum of "domestics" that shouldn't be either.  Just bums me out being a responsible honda owner/tuner and getting tossed into a mix I despise myself.

My point being that it should be up to the techs to use common sense and weed out the garbage that does show up.  Make the participation rules tougher, sign and understand the rules.  Hell there's sooooo many participants that don't even know how to line up the car at the lights.  I'm willing to bet that the time spent every night backing cars up and dealing with the idiots doing 5 minute burnouts adds up to a lengthy track cleanup session.

Pass out a little flyer explaining the basics of using the facility, how to line up, what to do if your vehicle does have a problem and how to NOT be an idiot on the return road.  God knows there's plenty of time to sit and read it while you're in line.


Edited by VegasHB - 09 Jan 2009 at 6:00pm
Back to Top
Rowdy View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jun 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote Rowdy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2009 at 7:57pm
Not directed towards imports at all and I'll go as far as to say that your wrinkle walled turbo ricer is far more welcome to line up next to me than 99% of anything that would be representative of the new OEM rules. In fact, the worst safety issue that I can recall seeing was an otherwise stock, Fox body Mustang running two compact spare tires (donuts) on the front. I appreciate anything fast, which could occasionally even include hacks. Although I'm mainly interested in "what it'll do today", I try my best to manipulate my car along side whatever is nearby that looks like it would be competitve  I'll admit, I tend to be American Muscle bias, if for no other reason than the photo factor.
 
An instructional pamphlet is exactly what I was referring to in my previous post. One page of simple directions on basic procedures and etiquette would go a long way to speed things up.
Rowdy
1966 Chevelle
Best ET 10.59
    MPH 129.62
2007 MM/CarCraft AntiTour Link
http://media.putfile.com/April-27-drags
Back to Top
V8 Monza View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
  Quote V8 Monza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jan 2009 at 11:35pm
E-mail the guy in charge.
 
I did...
 

The new rules won't prevent fluid leakage or oil-downs which can happen to any OEM or Top Fuel vehicle and everything in between and doesn't even begin to validate all of the rule changes.  So if the real reason is anti-freeze and synthetic oils just say so.  BTW, do you think OEMs won't run antifreeze or synthetic oils?


A)  OEM only?  This program was designed to encourage all "street racers" to come to the track, not just OEM racers.  Who in their right mind thinks street racers only drive OEM cars?

B)  Most of the OEM cars racing at Midnight Mayhem turn 16-20+ second or slower times.  The number of people that will sit still and watch that kind of action would probably rather stay home and work on their crochet, but just in case they show up you should change the menu at the snack bar to include Ensure and Fiber One.

 

C)  Relocated batteries, superchargers, different engines/transmissions, etc. are fine if they are done in accordance with NHRA (or other sanctioning body) rules.

D)  What if this went the other way, what if instead you were insisting that all OEM cars have battery boxes, battery shut-offs, wheel studs that protrude through an open faced lug nuts, C-Clip eliminators, driveshaft safety loops, blow-proof bell housings, and c*ckpit mounted fire extinguishers?  It might make racing safer, but again the rules wouldn't prevent fluid leaks or oil-downs.  We all want is a solution that is fair, makes the sport safer and allows those who follow the rules to race.  Rethink the problem and come up with a real solution that actually addresses the problem. 

I can understand just about any rule that make cars safer, but many of the new rules don't make sense.  Many modifications to vehicles make them safer if done correctly, so it sounds to me like the real issue is a need for experienced tech guys.  I can understand DOT tires, with all of the street tires driving through the water box and dropping water on the track that rule makes sense.  But some rules like OEM fuel injection, OEM ignition, relocated batteries, etc.  If a battery is relocated it's a simple matter of the tech guy checking to ensure it's properly mounted.
You guys went too far, what you need is good tech inspectors that will turn away some of the crap that shows up to run. 

Out casting a certain group because of a few who broke the rules will kill this sport, and not fix the problem.  Take a tip from racelegal.com, here's a link to their rules which make a lot more sense.  http://racelegal.com/web/faq.asp#6

Thanks,
V8 Monza
v8monza.com where the V8 Vega and V8 Monza thrive.
Back to Top
Rowdy View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jun 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote Rowdy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jan 2009 at 12:59pm
Well, this thread has been up for a couple of weeks and no one from the track has addressed our concerns. What's up with that? Are they waiting to see Fridays turnout? 
 
I wonder if a direct link to the forum can be incorporated into the LVMS Home page. I'm sure all that have posted just happened to stumble across it the same way I did, clicking on "discuss". Safe to say that there is consderably more concern than has been represented so far. As it is, it seems like an awfully covert method of hosting a forum. 
 
Unfortunately, I will not be racing this weekend, and not because of the new rules, rather a unsettling noise that the source has yet to be identified. I considered attending as a spectator for the sole purpose of seeing how these rule will be instituted, but am reluctant to bolster the gate count if they indeed refuse entry to the only cars worth watching.
Rowdy
1966 Chevelle
Best ET 10.59
    MPH 129.62
2007 MM/CarCraft AntiTour Link
http://media.putfile.com/April-27-drags
Back to Top
Big Bob View Drop Down
New Member
New Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2009
Location: las vegas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
  Quote Big Bob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2009 at 8:50am
The MM is one of the best programs in the country in geting kids off the streets. Drag racing has gotten a bad name from the people who think that going fast is what it's all about. The NHRA was founded on the idea of "saftey first" and is still the main goal. There are a great amoun of fast,no matter who makes it, street cars in Vegas and these cars should have a place to race in a safe, friendly and secure enviroment. No guns,drugs and gang bangers needed at the race track, but SAFE CARS is a must. The bracket progam tried to get some of the local import racers to attend the bracket races and ended the sport compact class due to very low entrys. The sport of drag racing has grown for back yard hot rods to a multimillion dollar sport and still needs support of the little gut to surrive. The LVMS and changed the rules around it's progams before and then reversed the ruling when it didn't work for those involved. Being involved with the track and working with them will only help your cause. I feel the people who don't like the MM should try going to the bracket race format and enter there car. They may even learn something about the sport and progress away from a street car to a full blown race car and never look back. We as racers, locals and hot roders need to keep the program working to keep the kids off the streets and at the track where racing belongs, but is must be safe and fun for all of the people involved. there is nothing worse then sitting in the pits ready to go for hours after someone had kicked the rods out of there motor and waiting for clean up. I run as much saftey equiptment on my car as possible and when you start to learn it's about being as safe as you can be, for all parties involed, you may start to under stand where the speedway is coming from, hey at least they promote the MM,you get to race in front of a croud and not empty stands or end up in handcuffs after you killed one of your friends or some kid just watching.  SPEAK YOUR MIND and get involved, not just bithcin about the changes to the program. 
sst7326
Back to Top
Red View Drop Down
New Member
New Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Location: So. Cal.
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
  Quote Red Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Oct 2009 at 7:23pm
Can't rules be bent ?
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Atlanta Motor Speedway | Bristol Motor Speedway | Lowe’s Motor Speedway | Texas Motor Speedway | Las Vegas Motor Speedway | Infineon Raceway
zMax | Go PRN | Go Speedway | Go Speedway World | 600 Racing | Speedway Children’s Charities | Jim Russell Racing

© 2006 Speedway Motorsports, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Web Hosting Provided by Hosted Solutions